Defra releases anticipated ‘PFAS Plan’

Today we published an update on Defra’s PFAS Plan: “UK Government Releases PFAS Plan Teased in December 2025“. This plan features among the commitments made in the Environmental Improvement Plan made public at the end of last year.

It is generally recognised that the UK needs a plan for PFAS management, but in the hours following the publication of the plan, some commentators expressed that some of the measures identified in the plan lacked clarity (in particular in relation to specific timeframes).

Tackling PFAS is a key policy area in the EU and UK. At the end of January, the European Commission published a report (“The cost of PFAS pollution for our society“) estimating that “if the current levels of PFAS pollution in Europe continue until 2050 without regulatory action, the cost will reach approximately €440 billion during that period. Tackling such PFAS releases at the source by 2040 would save €110 billion, whereas treating polluted water alone would cost more than €1 trillion.”

But PFAS are a wide group of substances, integrated into countless product supply chains, and across most industries, in many cases with no clear alternatives. Another notable piece of research focusing on six fluoropolymers and F Gas and examining the potential impact of a full or partial EU REACH restriction recently called for a “balanced approach that protects the environment while preserving industrial and technological capability” (“The [PFAS] and their role as enablers in the competitiveness of European industry“). This document will be of particular interest to businesses in the aerospace, defence, green energy, and semiconductor sectors.

‘A New Vision for Water’ – Defra’s White Paper and Other January 2026 Developments

It has been a busy start to the new year for water law and policy with various developments published in the last couple of weeks. Following the release in December 2025 of the Environmental Improvement Plan (EIP), which lists a number of commitments on water, Defra published a long awaited Water White Paper this week setting out the government’s action plan for water regulation. Earlier this month, we also saw Defra release details of the mandatory annual pollution-cutting plans that water companies will be obligated to produce under the Water (Special Measures) Act 2025 (the ‘2025 Act’). On the same day, the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) issue information notices to Defra and the Environment Agency (EA) for ‘possible failures’ under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) Regulations.

We consider these developments below.

  1. Defra’s Water White Paper revealed – ‘A New Vision For Water’

The Water White Paper marks Defra’s intention to break with the ‘piecemeal’ and ‘disjointed’ approach of past water reforms and to focus on its ‘most critical outcomes’, i.e., delivering a safe and secure water supply, a protected and enhanced environment, and a ‘fair deal’ to customers and investors.

A large portion of the Water White Paper is dedicated, as anticipated, to the establishment of a new integrated water regulator. This new body will consolidate certain water-related roles historically played by the EA, Natural England, Ofwat and the Drinking Water Inspectorate into an integrated water regulator. There is an emphasis in the Water White Paper of the new regulator taking a ‘supervisory approach’ to regulation that will ‘shift regulation towards being more proactive and targeted to the specific needs of each water company to improve performance – while also increasing grip over water company delivery’. A Chief Engineer will sit inside the new water regulator to oversee what is described as a fundamental shift in the culture of the regulator and to provide the appropriate technical capability and engineering expertise.

Other developments noted in the Water White Paper include:

  • Appointment of a chair-designate of the new water regulator.
  • Establishment of a Regional Water Planning Steering Group to test new elements of the regional water planning function.
  • Introduction of a Water Reform Bill to Parliament (though little is said on this beyond ‘reset’ of the legislative framework including “elements of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Regulations and exploring updates to the Water Framework Directive Regulations, where needed”).
  • Introduction of a new Performance Improvement Regime (PIR) for poorly performing water companies. This will include an ‘MOT approach’ for water company infrastructure, requiring health checks on pipes, pumps and more.
  • Defra’s publication of a ‘Transitional Plan’ in 2026 with an accompanying interim Strategic Policy Statement to set out how changes will happen and who is responsible throughout the development of the new integrated regulator.

This document signals Defra’s desire to bring long term stability to this critical policy area. However, there have been mixed reactions from the industry. Environmental campaigners have said of the Water White Paper that ‘without significant new government funding it will not be the radical, transformational change that we hoped for or that communities, our environment and the economy need’. Others welcomed the document as an important step towards a joined-up and outcomes focussed framework.

2. Mandatory Pollution Incident Reduction Plans for Water Companies

Implementing Pollution Incident Reduction Plans (PIRP) is a key part of the 2025 Act, which aims to strengthen the enforcement powers of the water industry regulators to tackle offences by water companies and their chief executives.

On 8 January 2026, Defra released guidance on the mandatory requirement, under the 2025 Act, for water and sewerage companies to publish PIRP by April 2026 and annually thereafter. The PIRP is required to be published on water and sewerage companies’ website and published annually, with criminal sanctions for failure to meet this duty.

The guidance contains:

  1. An overview of the legal requirements and regulatory actions.
  2. Principles for preparing and publishing both the PIPR and ‘implementation reports’ that must be published before April 2027, and annually thereafter, to show their progress in reducing water pollution incidents. Both PIRP and Implementation Reports must include a statement by the company’s chief executive that they have personally approved the plan.
  3. Details on the required structure and content for the PIRP and implementation reports. It is notable that, in addition to reporting the frequency and seriousness of pollution incidents, water and sewerage companies are required to detail the steps taken to maintain any structure or apparatus that has been the cause of any pollution incidents, the measures taken to reduce the occurrence, and the impact that the measures will have.

In addition to PIRP and implementation reports, the 2025 Act has a number of other notable features, including:

  • The modification of the standard of proof of civil penalties from ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ to ‘on the balance of probabilities’.
  • Restricting remuneration of directors and chief executives if specific standards are not met.
  • The introduction of automatic penalties for certain offences.

3. OEP Information Notices to Defra and the EA

The OEP was created in November 2021 and is responsible for holding Defra and other public authorities accountable for their obligations under environmental law.

In amongst these publications from Defra, on 8 January 2026, the OEP confirmed that it had issued information notices setting out the details of suspected failures by Defra and the EA to comply with the WFD Regulations. These possible failures relate to:

  • The public authorities’ duties to exercise functions aimed at achievingthe WFD’s environmental objectives, including setting objectives for each river basin district and establishing programmes of measures.
  • Not meeting requirements for setting less stringent environmental objectives and ensuring public participation in the development of River Basin Management Plans. The OEP found that existing plans for water companies were “too generic” and were implemented despite low government confidence that key improvement targets for water companies by 2027 would be achieved.

Defra and EA have two months to respond to the OEP at which point the OEP will consider ‘next steps’.

4. Defra’s EIP

The above developments follow the publication last month of Defra’s EIP. The EIP is the UK cross-governmental roadmap for improving the natural environment in England. It builds on the Environment Act 2021, setting out 10 overarching goals for environmental improvement. Each goal is accompanied by specific commitments and actions linked to measurable outcomes. The delivery of these outcomes is shared across various stakeholders including government, local authorities, businesses (including water companies), landowners, and communities and progress will be tracked through statutory targets, interim milestones, and annual reports.

The EIP includes a number of commitments and actions associated with ‘Goal 3: Ensure English Waters are clean, resilient, and plentiful’. For example:

  • Commitment 25: Reduce phosphorus loadings from treated wastewater by 55% by December 2030 against a 2020 baseline. As an action under this commitment, water companies will be required to upgrade 440 wastewater treatment works by 2030.
  • Commitment 29: Drive further investment to improve the water environment. As an action under this commitment, water companies, must support delivery of £24 billion of water company expenditure to improve the environment.
  • Commitment 34: Ensure water companies deliver their water resources management plans, eliminating the water supply demand gap that grows to 5 billion litres a day by 2050. As an action under this commitment, water companies are responsible for rapidly developing a ‘Regulators’ Alliance for Progressing Infrastructure Development and the National Framework for Water Resources.
  • Commitment 35: Modernise the abstraction licensing system, including moving it into the Environmental Permitting Regulations (EPR). Water companies (along with the EA and water users) are tasked with working with abstractors to find voluntary local solutions to reduce unsustainable abstraction or, if required, using powers to modify these abstraction licences.

If you wish to discuss these developments or water law more generally, please get in touch with a member of our Environmental, Safety, and Health team.

The authors would like to thank Jody Li (trainee) for her contribution to this piece.

Omnibus I Reforms

After over 12 months of legal uncertainty, the EU has finalised the Omnibus I reforms and there is certainty as to who will need to report under the EU Corporate Sustainability Directive (CSRD) and EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CS3D).

To recap and in summary, CSRD required around 46,000 companies established in the EU, and non-EU entities with a large presence in the EU, to report in their annual accounts their ESG impacts and opportunities. Reporting created greater transparency but became very costly and burdensome due to uncertain obligations, information requests across global value chains and untested ESG reporting standards.

Continue Reading

The EU AI Act and The Automotive Sector: Why Are Product Conformity Regimes Relevant to High-risk AI Systems?

Introduction

From autonomous-driving to ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems), to the potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) to transform the aftermarket, AI is much-discussed as being transformational in the automotive sector; and there are numerous reported examples of AI being used already, for design, validation and performance management, connected with the manufacturing process.

However, automotive businesses developing, supplying and/or using AI tools now, or planning to do so in future, should be aware of emerging legislation that may impose mandatory legal obligations on parties involved in the AI system “life-cycle”.

Continue Reading

Important Updates on California’s Climate Disclosure Laws

flags

California’s climate disclosure laws continue to present novel challenges and twists and turns to regulated businesses, and the past month is no exception. Since our last blog post on this topic, there have been significant developments regarding the implementation of SB 261 and SB 253. On November 18, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined the California Air Resources Board (CARB) from enforcing SB 261, which requires companies to disclose climate-related financial risks. Importantly, the injunction was issued prior to the January 1 deadline for companies to publish their climate-related financial risk report pursuant to SB 261. On December 1, 2025, CARB issued an Enforcement Advisory confirming it would not enforce against companies for failure to post a climate-related financial risk report on January 1, 2026. Then, on December 9, 2025, CARB posted proposed regulations applicable to SB 253 and SB 261. Further details and considerations are discussed in this blog post.

Continue Reading

Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) Publishes Guidance on Advertising of Less Healthy Food and Drink Products

The highly anticipated ASA guidance on the advertising of less healthy food and drink products (Guidance) was published on 5 December 2025. This follows the ASA’s autumn 2025 consultation on the implementation of the less healthy food and drink advertising restrictions, and in particular how this would affect brand advertising.

Legal Context for the Guidance

From 5 January 2026, the Less Healthy Food Definitions and Exemptions Regulations 2024 will impose new restrictions banning ads for “identifiable” food and drinks that are high in fat, salt or sugar (HFSS) from being shown on Office of Communication (Ofcom)-regulated TV services, as well as Ofcom-regulated on-demand programme services between 5:30 a.m. and 9 p.m. in the UK, or at any time in online paid-for advertising.

Continue Reading

The UK’s Food Standards Agency (FSA) Has Issued a Public Consultation on the Proposed Ban of Bisphenol A (BPA) and Other Bisphenols on Food-contact Materials and Articles (FCMs) in the UK

The consultation was launched on 2 October, and is open until 24 December 2025.

This consultation applies to England, Northern Ireland (NI) and Wales, and the FSA is seeking views on a proposed ban on the use of:

  • Bisphenol A (BPA)
  • Other bisphenols (BPS, BPF)
  • Bisphenol derivatives

in FCMs (i.e. materials and articles that are intended to be, or can reasonably be expected to be, brought into contact with food and drink products).

In Scotland, Food Standards Scotland (FSS) launched an equivalent consultation on the 27 October, that is open until 16 January 2026. This is a UK four nation commitment working together to establish a Food and Feed Safety and Hygiene Common framework, as this is a devolved area of legislation.

The rationale for the ban is to reduce public exposure to these chemicals and protect public health from alleged impacts on the endocrine, reproductive and immune systems. The provisions could affect food-production equipment coming into contact with food and drink, as well as packaging and other FCMs (such as containers, kitchenware, varnishes and coatings) intended for consumer-use.

Continue Reading

Supply Chain Transparency: UK Government Responds to Joint Committee Recommendations on Modern Slavery Laws

The UK modern slavery regime has faced scrutiny in recent years for failing to keep up with requirements in other jurisdictions. A recent UK government publication offers a timely and illustrative example of how UK modern slavery laws are being reviewed. The document outlines the Government’s response to various recommendations made by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (a Parliamentary body) in a July report titled Forced Labour in UK Supply Chains (Sixth Report of Session 2024–25 HC 633 / HL Paper 159).

Continue Reading

House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee Considers the Brand Advertising Exemption Regulations

As we reported in the last edition of newsBITE, the Advertising (Less Healthy Food and Drink) (Brand Advertising Exemption) Regulations 2025 (Brand Advertising Exemption Regulations) were published in September 2025.

The Brand Advertising Exemption Regulations came into force on 31 October 2025. They provide that “brand” advertising that does not identify a specific, less healthy product, is outside the scope of highly anticipated restrictions, which will come into force in January 2026, under the Advertising (Less Healthy Food Definitions and Exemptions) Regulations 2024 (Advertising Regulations).

Continue Reading

LexBlog